|
Penpractice.com |
|
Reprinted from the Journal of the Writing Equipment Society (UK), July 2006 |
|
Pen Mechanisms Revealed 4. The Stephens Button Filler |
|
|
|
Laurence Oldfield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fig.1: Advert from The British Stationer, November 1935 |
|
The Stephens pen provided novelty in that it was probably the first to have a blind cap permanently fixed to the pen so that it could not be lost as was so often the case with, for example, the Parker button fillers. The idea of a fixed button had been around for some time, and one version had been patented by Frederick Double in 1928 (Figure 2). |
|
|
|
Double proposed a button with a cam arranged to operate a short rod connected to the end of the sac pressure bar. A half turn of the knob depressed the bar until the rod clicked off the end of the cam, allowing the pressure bar and sac to relax so that ink could be drawn in. The design was probably the inspiration for Debretts Top Lever pen promoted by manufacturers Curzons and Lang, which was in production with Langs until about 1931. |

|
Fig.2: 1928 UK Patent 297,903 |


|
Fig.3: 1935 UK Patent 442,262 |
|
Fig.4: Button fillers 56, 76 and 106 (the 76 should have a narrow nickel cap band). |
|
In 1937 Stephens produced a deluxe model with the same mechanism, but it had three gold filled bands, end jewels and a larger nib. It was priced at 1 Guinea (21 shillings) and carried the model number 21. In January 1941 the Stephens pen repair department was another casualty of WW2 bombs, and pens under repair were lost, probably together with repair documents, drawings and manuals. It is likely that production of these pens ended at this time because Langs production machinery was requisitioned by the Board of Trade for automatic production of weapons. |

|
Fig. 5: The dismantled pen |
|
Mode of operation |
|
|
|
To fill the pen, the button is unscrewed (Figure 7) as far as it will go (limited by the screw on the end of the brass rod) and is then pushed in as far as it will go. The pressure bar is then bent and the sac compressed. Upon release of the button the sac expands again and produces the suction that draws ink into the pen. |
|
Dismantling and renewal of the sac |
|
Dismantling a pen, especially one that has been undisturbed for over 70 years, should not be undertaken lightly. All restoration and repair carries a risk, so it is essential to study the construction and be aware of what can go wrong. Ideally, the pen should be soaked in cold water for 12 hours (be careful not to do this for casein pens such as the Conway Dinkie 550) and then placed in an ultrasonic cleaner for five minutes. This usually loosens any hardened ink and corrosion. The first step is to remove the section. Using leather or rubber lined pliers, the section should unscrew without difficulty if a little hot air is applied first. Hot air will also be useful to help the process of unscrewing the filler button cap, but it will be necessary to use a thin rubber sheet to achieve adequate grip. Beneath the cap, the slotted top of the brass screw that attaches the button to the brass plunger will be seen. When this is unscrewed, be careful not to lose the small lock washer. Occasionally, the brass plunger becomes fused to the aluminium bush and cannot be removed until the bush is unscrewed from the pen barrel. |
|
Using the Stephens pen |
|
|
|
These pens are amongst the most stylish of the 1930s and should merit an important place in any collection of UK pens. They are also a delight to use and are well worth the effort of restoration. Their ink capacity and filling procedure is similar to any of the earlier button fillers, but they retain the novelty of having a button that cannot be lost. |
|
References |
|
|
|
Stephen Hull, Penchant, WES Journal, vol. 43, p39, 1995 |
|
Acknowledgement |
|
|
|
I am indebted to Steve Hull for background information and helpful comments and also to Mike Bryan for permission to use the information contained in his earlier article. |


|
Fig. 6: The button mechanism |
|
Fig.7: The button in the extended position |
